China says Rio-BHP iron ore joint venture may be a monopoly

Rio Tinto and BHP Billiton's proposed iron-ore joint venture probably won't happen until a year from now but the marriage proposal, already under attack by the World Steel Association and Eurofer, the European Union's steel lobbying group, now is being assailed by China as "monopolistic."

As reported earlier, Rio Tinto scrapped a proposed $19.5-billion tie-up with Chinese metals group Chinalco two weeks ago and instead coordinated plans for an iron ore production joint venture in Western Australia with rival Australian miner BHP Billiton.

Reuters News reports that BHP Billiton executives have said the joint venture is unlikely to trigger a change in the controversial annual benchmark pricing. But China's state media is quoting Chen Yanhai, the head of the raw material department at the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, as saying "the potential deal has an obvious color of monopoly." He adds that the joint venture "is likely to have a big impact on the Chinese steel industry as China is the world's biggest iron ore importer" (so) the deal should be subject to Chinese anti-monopoly law."

The joint venture brouhaha is a backdrop to this year's contentious iron ore contact talks. China, the world's largest steel producer, has been holding out for a minimum 40-45% price cut from Australian and Brazilian suppliers after Japanese and Korean firms accepted 33%. The Chinese steelmakers toughened their position last week by threatening to walk away from fiscal 2009-2010 contract talks and to reduce steel output.

Copyright and Exemption Declaration :¢ÙAll articles, pictures and videos that are marked with "China Aluminum Network" on this website are copyright and belong to China Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn). When transshipment, any media, website or individual must list the source from "China Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn)". We seek legal actions against anyone that disobey this. ¢ÚArticles that marked as copy from others are for transferring more information to readers, do not represent or endorse their opinions or accuracy and reliability. When other media, website or individuals copy from our website, must keep the source. Anyone that changes the articles' sources will hold the responsibilities for copyright and law problems. We also seek legal actions against anyone that disobey this. ¢ÛIf any articles copied by our website concern the copyright and other problems, please contact us within one week.