Your Location > Home > News & Market >International News > U.S. aluminum, steel producers allege railroad companies of overcharging customers over fuel surcharge
Today' Focus
-
Hangzhou Jinjiang Group's general manager Zhang Jianyang, vice general manager Sun Jiabin and their team had attended the SECOND BELT AND ROAD FORUM FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, they also attended the signing ceremony of comprehensive strateg...
International News
Domestic News
International News
U.S. aluminum, steel producers allege railroad companies of overcharging customers over fuel surcharge
- China Aluminium Network
- Post Time: 2019/10/14
- Click Amount: 462
A number of aluminium companies and steelmakers along with other suppliers recently filed separate complaints against four largest railroad companies in the United States. They alleged that the railroad companies in the United States conspired to raise prices and overcharge customers billions of money for freight services over a period of five years. They did this under the guise of fuel cost recovery program.
Among the aluminium companies, Alcoa Corp., Pittsburgh; Alumax Mill Products, Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Arconic, Pittsburgh; Northwest Alloys, Washington; Reynolds Metals Co., Richmond, Virginia; and Eastalco Aluminum and Intalco Aluminum, subsidiaries of Alcoa, filed a lawsuit Sept. 30 with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania.
The companies alleged that BNSF Railway Co., CSX Transportation Inc., Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and Union Pacific Railroad have conspired to increase the complainant’s rates from 2003 to 2008.
"In 2003, the four largest United States-based Class I railroads engaged in an extraordinary series of meetings, phone calls and email communications through which they embarked on a conspiracy -- under the guise of a fuel cost recovery program -- to apply and enforce rail fuel surcharges across their customers in order to generate profits," Alcoa wrote in the lawsuit.
The railroads denied the accusation and claimed that the rail fuel surcharge was because of rising fuel costs. The complainants claimed in its filing that the surcharge was a “means to raise and fix the price of rate-unregulated rail freight transportation services.” They referred to a report by S&P Global, which showed that the railroads had collected billions of dollars of additional profits with the help of this fuel surcharge conspiracy.
- Copyright and Exemption Declaration :①All articles, pictures and videos that are marked with "China Aluminum Network" on this website are copyright and belong to China
Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn). When transshipment, any media, website or individual must list the source from "China
Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn)". We seek legal actions against anyone that disobey this.
②Articles that marked as copy from others are for transferring more information to readers, do not represent or endorse their opinions or
accuracy and reliability. When other media, website or individuals copy from our website, must keep the source. Anyone that changes the
articles' sources will hold the responsibilities for copyright and law problems. We also seek legal actions against anyone that disobey
this.
③If any articles copied by our website concern the copyright and other problems, please contact us within one week.