Your Location > Home > News & Market >Domestic News > Alcan/Alcoa Merger: This One Won't Be Easy
Today' Focus
-
Hangzhou Jinjiang Group's general manager Zhang Jianyang, vice general manager Sun Jiabin and their team had attended the SECOND BELT AND ROAD FORUM FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION, they also attended the signing ceremony of comprehensive strateg...
International News
Domestic News
Domestic News
Alcan/Alcoa Merger: This One Won't Be Easy
- China Aluminium Network
- Post Time: 2007/5/22
- Click Amount: 680
Alcoa filed the initial S-4 for its proposed transaction with Alcan with the SEC on May 7. The current exchange offer expiration is July 10, 2007.
The document lists the following as regulatory requirements: HSR, Competition Canada, Investment Canada, EU, Australian Competition and Consumer Commission, Australian FIRB, as well as potential approvals necessary "other" non-U.S. jurisdictions. Needless to say, each of these regulators will have a significant interest in this potential combination, particularly the DOJ and European Commission. That this case will draw an HSR second request and EU long-extension is a given. It will simply boil down to determining which niche aluminum segments will require remedies (also a virtual certainty) and how quickly the companies and the regulators can come to a divestiture agreement. Naturally, this assumes that the companies will eventually reach a formal agreement, or that Alcoa will succeed in its hostile takeover efforts.
Via the Rusal/Glencore/Sual combination completed last month, Alcoa is no longer the undisputed international aluminum/alumina producer. While this may ultimately bode well for a potential Alcan/Alcoa deal in terms of the long-term regulatory prospects, the fact remains that in the U.S., and less so in Europe, a combined Alcan/Alcoa will undeniably dominate some specific product markets -- particularly in aerospace applications. It is very likely within these product niches that any/all regulatory delays will occur. Thus, the key regulators will find it necessary to assess both the broad-market implications of the combination, as well as the niche market issues noted above. Add to this the fact that there has been very little change in the aluminum industry in the past several years leading up to this point, and the potential merger becomes even more significant from a regulatory perspective. In other words, the DOJ and EU have not had the occasion to look at this industry in quite some time. This could easily translate into very lengthy regulatory processes.
The registration statement does not specify filing dates for the various regulators. It can be assumed that Alcoa will begin submitting the required notifications before the end of this month, given that it has been planning the transaction for quite some time. Assuming the DOJ, EU, and Canadian notifications are filed before the end of May, review extensions can be anticipated in June, followed by at least four months of additional review periods. The DOJ review is likely to extend well into the fall, and probably into the winter, of this year. On a non-regulatory note, several analytical reports have suggested a high possibility of a competing offer for Alcan from various third parties. At this time, while acknowledging that a third-party offer is possible, this publication does not see Alcoa backing away from its takeover attempt without a major fight. Alcoa simply has too much to gain if it can successful pull of this deal. What's more, Alcoa simply is not a company well-versed in major merger transactions and it is highly unlikely that a lesser, or equal, entity can dissuade it from its current goal of regaining the top spot in the aluminum industry.
Source:
- Copyright and Exemption Declaration :①All articles, pictures and videos that are marked with "China Aluminum Network" on this website are copyright and belong to China
Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn). When transshipment, any media, website or individual must list the source from "China
Aluminium Network (www.alu.com.cn)". We seek legal actions against anyone that disobey this.
②Articles that marked as copy from others are for transferring more information to readers, do not represent or endorse their opinions or
accuracy and reliability. When other media, website or individuals copy from our website, must keep the source. Anyone that changes the
articles' sources will hold the responsibilities for copyright and law problems. We also seek legal actions against anyone that disobey
this.
③If any articles copied by our website concern the copyright and other problems, please contact us within one week.